i greet you in the love and the light of theinfinite creator. why are there so many cancers now? catherine j. frompovich, guest. waking times. this is an �anthology� of sorts aboutthe etiology of the current cancer epidemic-pandemic. c-a-n-c-e-r is the word that strikes horrorin the hearts and minds of every human alive. however, that always was not the case. i�m old enough to remember when cancer wasa rather �rare� disease or condition. furthermore, i know medical doctors a littleolder than my �vintage� who say that when
they were in medical school, they were nottaught very much about cancer, so much so, that when a cancer patient was in one of thewards in a teaching hospital, the entire class of physicians-in-training was trotted in tosee that patient. how interesting? personally, i�m of the belief that thereis not very much new under the sun except what�s being designed and created by geneticmodification and geoengineering. cancer, undoubtedly, has been around in someform probably since very ancient times. however, the current �plague of cancers�,even though not an anomaly since just about everyone and his or her brother has or hadit, became �profitable� during the latter
half of the twentieth century. there is no doubt that cancer, as an �industry�,will become even more problematic�plus profitable�to the point where every person probably willcontract cancer in some form or other, almost as if by some ulterior design. why do i say that? because of how cancer has been made into a�profitable business,� revenue stream and profit center for varied and numerousvested interests, when there actually are cancer cures controlling vested interestssuppress or even keep for themselves. is that too harsh to hear?
well, have you recently looked into or checkedout the ridiculously-priced costs of cancer treatments and protocols? like all wars, the �war on cancer� isprofitable for vested interests. for starters, the average cost of a new cancerdrug is over $100,000 per year. newly-approved cancer drugs can cost about$10,000 on average per month, while some can top off at around, or over, $30,000 a month. contrast those prices with the cost of cancerdrugs a decade or so ago, which were a mere �smidgen� of only $4,500 a month. talk about inflation, or is it medical-pharmarip-off time?
owning a �cancer insurance� policy reallydoesn�t help defray many of those costs either. usually a cancer policy will state that itprovides a lump sum payment for �a covered cancer� or a recurrence of cancer. some policies will provide a lump sum cashpayout of x dollars upon diagnosis and that�s it! this website gives the �average� medicalcosts for various types of cancers. what do you think is the average salary anoncologist pulls in? that salary can range from approximately $294,000to $383,000 per year.
however, how do doctors feel about takingchemotherapy for themselves? when polled, the results showed �75% ofphysicians in the world refuse chemotherapy for themselves.� isn�t that interesting? in this article, �if chemotherapy fails97% of the time, why do doctors recommend it?� you may begin to understand that doctorsdon�t learn to cure anything! �they learn about chemicalintervention orsurgery to suppress symptoms. they don�t go for the root cause.� (thatwould put them out of business!) so how did allopathic medicine and humansbecome �partners� in cancer? the first documented case of cancer comesfrom ancient egypt.
according to the american cancer society,there are eight documented cases of breast cancer found on papyrus dating all the wayback to 3000 b.c. even the term cancer has been around for centuries�hippocrates, the greek physician who is widely considered the father of medicine, used thewords carcinos and carcinoma to describe tumors. incidentally, there is no mention of cancerper se, even though other diseases are mentioned, in the old and new testaments of the bible. however, individual interpretations, though,may lead some to conclude differently. cancer as a rarity in ancient times is notdisputed, although some fossilized bone tumors have been found in ancient human mummies.
the dreaded disease of antiquity was leprosyor what�s known in modern times as hansen�s disease. during the renaissance in europe, a betterunderstanding of the human body began to develop and that led to more diagnostics, especiallyonce post mortem operations (autopsies) became more of a routine procedure after death. the renaissance�s michelangelo, sculptorof �david,� was known to perform detailed anatomical dissections of �fresh cadavers,�which obviously led to his ability to �create� a marble man of extreme anatomical elegance. additionally, the invention of the microscopemoved pathogenesis along to a great degree
of sophisticated knowledge regarding diseasedtissues. it wasn�t until the 1900s that the �modern�or current understanding about cancer and things called �carcinogens� began to appearin science and medicine. coincidentally, or more accurately i say,parallel tracks relating to certain diseases began to manifest too. those parallels encompassed man-made chemicalsand cancer demographics! currently the �buzz words� also includeepigenetics. what went wrong. some of the most egregious assaults upon thehuman organism that contribute to cancers
are the inordinate use and amounts of toxicchemicals placed into food and water�deliberately! food growing, processing, preserving, coloringand taste enhancement-chemicals do not belong in food�period! they adulterate food and our bodies causingbiochemical and nutritional imbalances, including genotoxic dna problems that program cancers. neither do most of the man-made chemicalsused in water treatment facilities belong in water�the second-most vital element,besides air, for maintaining life. in my july 2016 book, eat to beat disease,foods medicinal qualities, i devote the introduction to chronicling how agriculture and the foodchain have been polluted chemically, basically
since the industrial revolution, and especiallysince world war ii when usa businesses and industries went haywire manufacturing, advertisingand selling chemicals and pharmaceuticals as �needed elements to make life better���betterliving through chemistry!� unfortunately, consumers bought into and �embraced� allthe �kill� chemicals for eliminating bugs, vermin, crab grass, weeds, etc. how hoodwinked were we not to realize thatanything that can kill one life form, can and will do irreparable or long-term damageto other life forms higher up the food chain? those �can�t do without� lawn chemicalsnow pollute our drinking water! in my professional opinion as a retired healthcareprofessional and consumer health researcher/journalist
and author, i feel toxic chemicals that haveimpacted the human central nervoussystem (the blood brain barrier being breached, in particular)plus the human immune system quite dramatically are what i�d classify as deliberately deceptivemoney-making enterprises. in my opinion, one is fluoridation of thewater supply and the other is vaccines with all their neurotoxic ingredients. fluoride is a protoplasmic poison [2-3-4],which can be involved in the etiology of cancers of the bone (osteosarcoma) and oral cancers. fluoride causes genetic damage; 19 major universitystudies have proven that! i�ll talk about vaccine chemicals lateron.
furthermore and sticking with toxically-pollutedwater, underground water aquifers are being poisoned by chemicals used in fracking forthe extraction of gas and oil found in shale deposits. according to the researchers who wrote thepaper �natural gas operations from a public health perspective,� there are �71 nastydrilling and fracturing chemicals that result in 10 or more health effects. but, i�m getting ahead of myself on thetimeline of the cancer epidemic-pandemic. radiation and radioactive particulates. ever since the manhattan project to buildand test nuclear weapons began (circa 1942),
the human race has been subjected to unnaturallevels of ionizing radiation circling the globe and impregnating air, food and water. thyroid cancers are a prime indication ofthat type of exposure. the manhattan project resulted in the detonationof two atomic bombs dropped by the usa in 1945 (hiroshima and nagasaki, japan), whichcreated radiation and radionuclides that affected everything on earth, including cow�s milkand the children who drank the milk! what type of damage does nuclear radiationdo to the body? three types of radiation damage may occur:bodily damage (mainly leukemia and cancers of the thyroid, lung, breast, bone, and gastrointestinaltract); genetic damage (birth defects and
constitutional and degenerative diseases dueto gonodal damage suffered by parents); and development and growth damage (primarily growthand mental retardation of unborn infants and young children). probably the most serious threat is cesium-137,a gamma emitter with a half-life of 30 years. it is a major source of radiation in nuclearfallout, and since it parallels potassium chemistry, it is readily taken into the bloodof animals and men and may be incorporated into tissue. other hazards are strontium-90, an electronemitter with a half-life of 28 years, and iodine-131 with a half-life of only 8 days.
strontium-90 follows calcium chemistry, sothat it is readily incorporated into the bones and teeth, particularly of young childrenwho have received milk from cows consuming contaminated forage. iodine-131 is a similar threat to infantsand children because of its concentration in the thyroid gland. in addition, there is plutonium-239, frequentlyused in nuclear explosives. a bone-seeker like strontium-90, it may alsobecome lodged in the lungs, where its intense local radiation can cause cancer or otherdamage. plutonium-239 decays through emission of analpha particle (helium nucleus) and has a
half-life of 24,000 years. to the extent that hydrogen fusion contributesto the explosive force of a weapon, two other radionuclides will be released: tritium (hydrogen-3),an electron emitter with a half-life of 12 years, and carbon-14, an electron emitterwith a half-life of 5,730 years. both are taken up through the food cycle andreadily incorporated in organic matter. shouldn�t we be asking what�s happeningto our air, food and water since chernobyl (1986) and especially since fukushima (2011)with its uncontained radioactive leaks into the pacific ocean and the atmosphere whichglobal nuclear powers seemingly aren�t willing to help clean up?
are food crops growing in usa�s westernstates of washington, oregon and california affected�including organically-grown crops? how about all the atmospheric nuclear testingdone by various �nuclear countries� that have stockpiled nuclear weapons? what have they put into the atmosphere? then there are the depleted uranium ordnancesused by the usa in fighting the gulf war, in iraq, and possibly syria. children born in iraq after that outrageouswar based upon the false pretense of �weapons of mass destruction that were not there, butthe usa obviously has� are suffering the
consequences of ionizing radiation and genotoxicchemicals, as told in this video. let�s not overlook all the �minor� nuclearpower plant �uneventful� leaks and shutdowns because of some sort of technology failures,the foremost being the three mile island �accident� outside harrisburg, pennsylvania, march 28,1979. also, do you know that all nuclear power plantsare permitted to emit regularly �safe� levels of radioactivity up their stacks? weather geoengineering �chemtrails�. let�s not forget the ever-persistent solarradiation management effort to control the weather�pardon my misspeak�to prevent�climate warming��using toxic chemical
sprays that cloud over the skies and producetoxic rain and snow, which pollute everything on earth, including the food we eat and thewater we drink, not to mention contaminating our lungs with nanoparticles probably engineeredto tag and �track� us or fashion us into radiofrequency �radio signal receivers�. isn�t the u.s. air force gearing up to ownthe weather as a weapon of war by 2025? some of the toxins found in the assays ofchemtrail-spiked rain water assayed in california include: aluminum. arsenic.
barium salts. cadmium. desiccated human blood cells. lead. mercury. mycoplasma. polymer fibers. radio cesium. strontium.
uranium. plus others. add to the above as a �contraindication�,another �parallel� of sorts, which involves chemtrails apparently contributing to a newly-occurringterrible health syndrome that presents as a crawling sensation under the skin with nanofibersemerging; it�s called morgellons disease. genetically modified organisms: food, animals,plants and organisms the high tech world of genetic engineeringor modification is so overwhelmingly large, i cannot begin to touch on it in this articlewhich, if i did, could wind up being the size of a book, so i will focus on only geneticallymodified �phood�, which i cover in great
detail in my july 2016 book, eat to beat disease,foods medicinal qualities. what i touch on next is minuscule in comparisonto the known and published research, science and literature, so i may be criticized fornot mentioning problems that some readers think i should have included but, inadvertently,have omitted. i apologize for that, but i�ve got to maketracks the best i can in tying this article in to the cancer epidemic-pandemic. notably since the 1980s (and even earlier)there have been full-bore scientific determinations to design and recreate nature and most, ifnot all, of nature�s attributes into the scientific power-dream of domination, control,skewing and modifying dna/rna in just about
everything that most humans refer to as �intelligentdesign�-created or god�s creation. genetic modification (gm/gmo/ge) affects justabout every facet of most life forms on planet earth now! the gmo �track� that has the better potentialand most immediately-effective strategy for refashioning human dna/rna besides vaccines,in my opinion, is gmo �phood�! that being said, i�d like to refer readersto another of my books, our chemical lives and the hijacking of our dna, a probe intowhat�s probably making us sick, wherein i discuss in greater depth gmos. as a matter of fact, while i was writing thatbook, i was in email contact with professor
s�ralini, phd, whose subsequent 2 year ratstudies on gmo feed has become a landmark study about cancerous tumors from gmo rationsand glyphosate. dr s�ralini�s work puts to rest, and absolutelytrashes, monsanto�s 90-day gmo-�safety�-studies presented to the fda for gmo technology approvals! that being said, monsanto�s gmo crops andthe monsanto gmo agricultural methods for growing those crops � the use of inordinateamounts of glyphosate in monsanto�s herbicide roundup� by contract farming or there arelegal problems for farmers � leave the planet, its livestock, almost all plant matter, soils/farms,pollinator insects and, especially, humans, who eat gmo �phoods� in dire straits.
gastrointestinal health problems affectingthe human microbiome from glyphosate residues found in most processed food is being documented[16]. children, who are vaccine damaged, get gastrointestinalrelief and find a way to wellness when put on a gmo-free diet. not only in food is glyphosate found, butin vaccines injected into infants, toddlers, teens, adults and senior citizens! see my article about that confirmation fromthe scientific research of anthony samsel, phd. glyphosate is a very toxic chemical!
i�d like to thank chris, who made a commentto my article above and which i want to share, since chris seems to know more about glyphosate�sinteresting �past�: glyphosate=n-phosphonomethyl glycine, containsthe amino acid glycine, which also happens to be the human inhibitingneurotransmitter!! dr. samsel and seneff published all the relevantdata on that issue, which somehow is not becoming loud enough! carcinogenicityofglyphosate was known by monsantoin 1981, and first later the biotech seed producer came to the idea to design new artificialgenes, which would bind the carcinogen glyphosate and make ~85% of all gmo�s glyphosate resistant.
what goes even further into history, is thefact that glycine supports fast proliferation of certain types of cancer, a fact known in1932!!! thus features of the glycine, one of the simplestamino acid on our planet were investigated thoroughly for decades, and once it was knownthat it participates in cancer growth, glyphosate was �discovered�, as the artificial chemicalmimick (replacement) of glycine. first it was used as �safest� herbicide,later it became the essence of most gmo�s produced by the biotech �seed� giants. the latest article about glyphosate from dr.samsel and seneff, goes into horrifying theoretical scenario, a production of peptoids, withinour bodies!
peptoids are not digestible, but once becomingparts of our bodies, certainly support some artificial unknown function. not for nothing dr. seneff works for the officeof �artificial intelligence�. the purpose of glyphosate was planned notonly for decades, but for almost a century by now� since glyphosate is deeply connectedwith almost all gmo�s, the entire biotechnology with its �fruits� has to be put into adeep investigation, a.s.a.p. [cjf emphasis added]. glyphosate�s �history�, as stated above,must be investigated immediately by reputable independentscientists, not monsanto�s orbayer�s �gophers�!
the u.s. cdc, fda, usda, epa and congressmust become involved immediately, if not sooner, and prevent the �marriage� of the bayer-monsanto�families� that probably will facilitate cancer even more than ever as a result ofthe �scientific� clout bayer will attain as the largest gmo seed producer in the world. electromagnetic and radiofrequency technologiescontribution to cancer. in this world of �smart� gadgets and appliances,everyone unknowingly has bought into being irradiated with non-ionizing microwave radiofrequencyenergies that have been declared a class 2b carcinogen by the iarc of the world healthorganization: press release n� 208 31 may 2011.
iarc classifies radiofrequency electromagneticfields as possibly carcinogenic to humans. lyon, france � may 30, 2011 the who/internationalagency for research on cancer (iarc) has classified radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possiblycarcinogenic to humans (group 2b), based upon an increased risk for glioma, a malignanttype of brain cancer associated with wireless phone use. what most folks probably aren�t aware ofis that all �smart� appliances operate on microwave technology frequencies and fallinto the same class 2b above, just not cell phones which are the primary wireless technologyin use. however, others equally as dangerous, if notmore so, include:
wi-fi in schools, offices and public places;utilities� ami smart meters; and any device that can send and receive data, voice, photos,messages, etc. using microwave technology! currently, there�s talk about google�s5g �wi-fi in the sky� project skybender [15]. god help us when that goes into effect! if you ever thought about wearing a tin-foil-hat,then that would be the time to do so. why? in order to protect your brains from being�fried�, i offer, from the research that�s been hidden deliberately by the microwavetech industry for years indicating non-thermal
adverse health effects known as electromagnetichypersensitivity and as a contributing factor to many types of cancers. whatever you do, please do not wear a �live�or active cell phone on your body, e.g., on your belt; in your pants pocket; in your bra;or an ear piece that�s not the proper type to prevent rfs from going directly into yourear and brain. all the above probably will pale to what iwill discuss next, i offer. probably a more significant factor for thecurrent cancer epidemic-pandemic is the fact that children in the 1950s through 1963 (orlonger, it�s thought) were vaccinated with polio vaccines containing a cancer virus,the sv40 virus.
more than 100 million children received thatcancer virus in the polio vaccine! i discuss that and much more about vaccineingredients in my book, vaccination voodoo, what you don�t know about vaccines. the u.s. congress held a hearing in 2003 whereinthey investigated and had to admit that. here�s the report �preventing anothersv40 tragedy: are today�s safe vaccine protocols effective?� [no! i offer.] dated november 13, 2003 admitting what happened. however, here�s what i wrote about thatsv40 vaccine problem for vactruth in 2011.
nothing speaks more clearly than dr mauricehilleman, the father of modern vaccines who worked for merck, talking very candidly aboutthose monkeys from whom the sv40 virus was derived. the long and short of the above vaccine tragedyis that apparently there may be some impact on cancer rates since the sv40 virus has beenfound in cancerous tumors excised from cancer patients! this article discusses the �cause and effect�issues revolving around sv40 and cancer. one can assume that there is �no cause andeffect� just like there is �no cause and effect� with the mmr vaccine and autismdue to the cdc�s blatant fraudulent scientific
findings as exposed by whistleblower williamthompson, phd, and told in the documentary movie vaxxed. however, that�s not the first time the cdchad fudged and falsified the connection between vaccines and autism; there�s the verstraetenstudy that was reworked circa 2000. attorney robert f kennedy, jr disclosed what�sbecome known as the �simpsonwood meeting� that effectuated the rework of cdc epidemiologistverstraeten�s confirmed autism-from-vaccines research data that somehow morphed into anewly-generated �no cause and effect to autism from vaccines� study. then there is the unfortunate problem of merckand company falsifying for ten years the effectiveness
rate of the mumps active in their mmr vaccine,which whistleblowers exposed and currently is before the federal court [18-19] in philadelphia,pennsylvania. we can�t trust the cdc, fda or the vaccinemakers when it comes to vaccine science! the cdc is the vaccine makers� championfor mandatory vaccinations. why, when vaccines contain so many neurotoxinsand probable carcinogenic ingredients like formaldehyde, and the cdc/fda should be protectinghealthcare consumers, not big pharma? is the current cancer epidemic-pandemic a�man-made� problem? as i said in the beginning of this �anthology,�cancer has been around since �forever�, but the current rate of contraction is farbeyond what could be termed �natural chances�.
everything, including pharmacology, whichi�ve not discussed, is implicated in a �cause and effect� with cancer ideologies, especiallyanything having to do with �man-made� chemicals, a great quantity of which affectsour food, water and the air we breathe. is it too late to do anything about the cancerepidemic-pandemic?
No comments:
Post a Comment